+44 1787 319001

Ground Mounted Vs Rooftop Solar Developments – Assessment Variations

Ground Mounted Vs Rooftop Solar Developments – Assessment Variations
May 20, 2016 Danny Scrivener

The overall assessment approach for rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) developments is the same as for large-scale ground mounted PV developments however some variations exist due to the difference in size, panel orientation and location. The following article presents an overview of the different assessment characteristics for ground mounted and rooftop developments.

Ground Mounted Solar Arrays vs Rooftop Solar Developments

Difference between rooftop and large-scale ground mounted developments

The significant difference is that the number of potential receptors and the overall duration of any impacts tend to be less for rooftop developments compared to large-scale ground mounted developments. This is because the panel area is smaller, and because the visibility of the panels is often restricted to a smaller number of receptors.

What could require assessment for a rooftop or large-scale ground mounted developments?

The four most common receptors that could require assessment are presented below:

  • Dwellings that could have a view of the panels.
  • Road users that could have a view of the panels.
  • Airports that could be affected by the development.
  • Railway lines adjacent to the property with the panels.

With regard to aviation, a glint and glare assessment would typically be required for developments within approximately 5 km of an airport. In some cases, assessments are requested at greater distances, particularly if a development lies beneath a final approach path.

Assessment parameters comparison

Table 1 below presents a comparison of the assessment parameters for rooftop and large-scale ground mounted PV developments.

Parameter/Development typeRooftop PV DevelopmentLarge-Scale Ground Mounted PV Development
Typical power outputUp to 1MW1MW +
Typical sizeIn the region of square meters.In the region of hectares
Most Likely Receptors [1] (top two)Aviation and dwelling receptorsRoad and dwelling receptors
Least Likely Receptors [2] (bottom two)Roads and railway receptorsAviation and railway receptors
Distance to assess to ~5km but sometimes out to 30km (based on aviation receptors)~5km but sometimes out to 30km (based on aviation receptors)
General location of solar reflectionsMany directions – based on rooftop designMostly east and west due to preferred southern panel azimuth angle
Case StudyTate Modern Rooftop DevelopmentCoolroe Solar Energy Development

Table 1: Comparison of the assessment parameters

Summary

Adverse effects are often more restricted for rooftop developments compared to large-scale ground mounted developments. However, this does not remove the requirement for a glint and glare assessment.

Note

[1] [2] Based on Pager Power’s experience.

0 Comments

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Make an Enquiry

You can make an enquiry here

    Your Name (required)Your Email (required)Subject Your Message